Sargis Sangari has failed to provide voters with positions on key issues covered by the 2020 Political Courage Test, despite repeated requests from Vote Smart and voters like you.
For Presidential and Congressional candidates who refuse to provide voters with their positions, Vote Smart has researched their public records to determine their likely responses. These issue positions are from 2020.
| Unknown Position | Do you generally support pro-choice or pro-life legislation? | ||
|
|||
| The words "life" and "choice" must not be used to divide Americans along party and ideological lines simply to garner political votes. Americans always defend individual legal rights and are tenacious in protecting life. Abortion has been SETTLED LAW SINCE 1973, reaffirmed by the court in 1986, 1989, and 1992 and has withstood major party shifts in the legislative and executive branch leadership in both the House and the Senate. I support common sense constitutional legislation or if required amendment to existing law that recognizes social issues or topics should not be addressed by politics of pro-choice or pro-life. | |||
| Yes | Do you support the regulation of indirect campaign contributions from corporations and unions? | ||
|
|||
| I AGREE that there SHOULD BE regulation of indirect campaign contributions, which may be made by corporations or unions. That is the Law and the law should be followed. If there were NO regulation on such INDIRECT CONTRIBUTIONS the Corporations or Unions would be able to deceive the voting public by using "front men/women" in order to support, or encourage, a candidate to vote/promote legislation, which is in their self-serving interest. Such a hidden agenda is simply not acceptable and would encourage such Corporations or Unions to empower the legislation of "self-serving" laws at the cost of the "public good". | |||
| Yes | Do you support federal spending as a means of promoting economic growth? | ||
| Yes | Do you support lowering corporate taxes as a means of promoting economic growth? | ||
| One of the purposes of government is to promote economic growth. History has demonstrated that a lower corporate tax promotes economic growth. This applies not just in the United States but also around the globe. | |||
| Yes | Do you support requiring states to adopt federal education standards? | ||
|
|||
| Certain basic and or minimum levels of achievement should be federally mandated given the federal government finances some state educational programs, all else is the province of the states. | |||
| Yes | Do you support government funding for the development of renewable energy (e.g. solar, wind, thermal)? | ||
| Yes | Do you support the federal regulation of greenhouse gas emissions? | ||
| Governments should invest in new forms of energy but their needs to be better supervision of the dollars invested. An investment in renewable energy is an investment in the long-term benefit of the general public. Also, pursuant to the current legislation empowering the EPA I support regulation of greenhouse gas emissions. | |||
| Yes | Do you generally support gun-control legislation? | ||
|
|||
| I endorse gun-control laws as currently legislated. I would suggest strongly that these laws be followed and the sever penalties which are assigned to those persons who abuse the use of any weapons enforced. | |||
| Unknown Position | Do you support repealing the 2010 Affordable Care Act ("Obamacare")? | ||
|
|||
| It is a law that has been proven to be disfunctional and not in the best interest of the general public. | |||
| Unknown Position | Do you support the construction of a wall along the Mexican border? | ||
|
|||
| Unknown Position | Do you support requiring immigrants who are unlawfully present to return to their country of origin before they are eligible for citizenship? | ||
|
|||
| In the areas where their is a wall preserving the sovereignty of the United States, the persons trying to enter our country illegally have avoided the wall obstacle and used easier crossing routes. The two political parties should not use the persons who are hoping to be DACA recipients as leverage for immigration reform negotiations. However, the persons who have entered our country illegally need to provide legal immigrants such as myself a reasonable justification as to why they should be given permission to jump ahead of family members who have applied to enter our nation legally. | |||
Vote Smart does not permit the use of its name or programs in any campaign activity, including advertising, debates, and speeches.